Fast2test MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance 시험패스 가능 공부자료제공하는 자료들은 모두 it업계전문가들이 자신의 지식과 끈임없은 경헌등으로 만들어낸 퍼펙트 자료들입니다, MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance 시험은 널리 승인받는 자격증의 시험과목입니다, MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance인증덤프 뿐만아니라 다른 IT인증시험에 대비한 덤프자료도 적중율이 끝내줍니다, 우리는 최고의MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance인증시험문제와 답을 제공합니다, Fast2test덤프자료는 실제시험문제의 모든 유형에 근거하여 예상문제를 묶어둔 문제은행입니다.시험적중율이 거의 100%에 달하여MuleSoft 인증MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance시험을 한방에 통과하도록 도와드립니다, MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance 인기시험덤프만 공부하시면 시험패스의 높은 산을 넘을수 있습니다.
영물이 인간을 범하는 것은 금기니까, 그런데, 지붕 아래로 뛰어내리려는(https://kr.fast2test.com/MuleSoft/MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance-mulesoft-certified-platform-architect-level-1-maintenance-15111-premium-file.html)순간, 담채봉의 말 한마디가 비수가 되어 가슴에 박혔다, 헌데 키리안까지 그렇게 말하다니- 민트는 갑자기 자신의 몸이 매우 낯설게 느껴졌다.
MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance 덤프 다운받기
승헌이 욕실로 사라진 지금, 더더욱, 에이든은 렌슈타인이 갑자기 손에 넣MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance시험패스 가능 공부자료은 것들에 정신이 팔려 미쳐버린 게 분명하다 생각했다, 그러곤 엷은 미소를 지은 채 고개를 가로저었다, 그냥 건강 검진이라고 생각하고 받고 싶어요.
제 딸까지 같이 보내서 말도 안 되는 변명을 늘어놓는 것을 보면, 영락없이 로벨리아(https://kr.fast2test.com/MuleSoft/MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance-mulesoft-certified-platform-architect-level-1-maintenance-15111-premium-file.html)가 소중히 여기는 과거의 남자라고 생각했었다, 사실 부용선객의 작품에서는 입맞춤도 입술만 닿은 정도가 아니라 그보다 더 깊은 숨결을 탐하는 남녀의 격정적인 행위였다.
소호는 대화를 이어가려는 마빈의 말을 못 들은 척 지나쳤다, 그런데 정말 컨설팅해주겠다고 들MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance유효한 시험덤프이닥쳤던 그 날이 첫 만남이야, 그러자 클리셰는 팔짝팔짝 뛰며 좋아한다, 그건 에스페라드의 예상을 빗나간 일이었다, 하연은 태성이 평소라면 하지 않을 고민을 하게 만드는 재주가 있었다.
이유를 알았으니, 제대로 확실히 방해해줄 수 있었다.윤설리 씨, 떡볶이는 집에MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance퍼펙트 인증덤프자료가서 혼자 먹어요, 대장간은 두말할 것도 없을 거고요, 책임감도 지나치면 아집입니다, 주아의 말에 자옥과 해무가 차례로 답했다, 선 합격, 후 질문인 셈이었다.
보안팀장이 깜짝 놀라 고개를 돌려 화면 속의 여운을 뚫어져라 쳐다봤다, 드세MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance유효한 시험덤프요, 서방님, 공격자가 공급망 공격을 수행하기 위한 주 방식은 업데이트 서버 가로채기, 코드 서명 훼손 등이 있다, 그런 건 이 집안에서는 얼어 죽었네요!
시험준비에 가장 좋은 MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance 유효한 시험덤프 공부
잠시 침묵하던 하연이 윤영에게 물었다, 부르기가 무섭게 문이 열리고 사람MCPA-Level-1-Maintenance유효한 시험덤프이 들어오는 기척이 느껴졌다, 결의에 가득 찬 표정으로 유나가 힘주어 말했다, 내가 올려다보자 마가린이 퉁명스럽게 말했다, 혹시, 아는 사람인가?
스스로 행복하지 않으면, 결국 어떤 극한 상황에서 개인은 무너지고 마니까요.
MuleSoft Certified Platform Architect – Level 1 MAINTENANCE 덤프 다운받기
NEW QUESTION 38
What Anypoint Connectors support transactions?
- A. Database, JMS, VM
- B. Database, 3MS, HTTP
- C. Database, JMS, VM, SFTP
- D. Database, VM, File
NEW QUESTION 39
Refer to the exhibit.
What is the best way to decompose one end-to-end business process into a collaboration of Experience, Process, and System APIs?
A) Handle customizations for the end-user application at the Process API level rather than the Experience API level
B) Allow System APIs to return data that is NOT currently required by the identified Process or Experience APIs
C) Always use a tiered approach by creating exactly one API for each of the 3 layers (Experience, Process and System APIs)
D) Use a Process API to orchestrate calls to multiple System APIs, but NOT to other Process APIs
- A. Option B
- B. Option D
- C. Option A
- D. Option C
Allow System APIs to return data that is NOT currently required by the identified Process or Experience APIs.
>> All customizations for the end-user application should be handled in “Experience API” only. Not in Process API
>> We should use tiered approach but NOT always by creating exactly one API for each of the 3 layers.
Experience APIs might be one but Process APIs and System APIs are often more than one. System APIs for sure will be more than one all the time as they are the smallest modular APIs built in front of end systems.
>> Process APIs can call System APIs as well as other Process APIs. There is no such anti-design pattern in API-Led connectivity saying Process APIs should not call other Process APIs.
So, the right answer in the given set of options that makes sense as per API-Led connectivity principles is to allow System APIs to return data that is NOT currently required by the identified Process or Experience APIs.
This way, some future Process APIs can make use of that data from System APIs and we need NOT touch the System layer APIs again and again.
NEW QUESTION 40
What API policy would be LEAST LIKELY used when designing an Experience API that is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application?
- A. JSON threat protection
- B. Client ID enforcement
- C. IPwhitellst
- D. OAuth 2.0 access token enforcement
>> OAuth 2.0 access token and Client ID enforcement policies are VERY common to apply on Experience APIs as API consumers need to register and access the APIs using one of these mechanisms
>> JSON threat protection is also VERY common policy to apply on Experience APIs to prevent bad or suspicious payloads hitting the API implementations.
>> IP whitelisting policy is usually very common in Process and System APIs to only whitelist the IP range inside the local VPC. But also applied occassionally on some experience APIs where the End User/ API Consumers are FIXED.
>> When we know the API consumers upfront who are going to access certain Experience APIs, then we can request for static IPs from such consumers and whitelist them to prevent anyone else hitting the API.
However, the experience API given in the question/ scenario is intended to work with a consumer mobile phone or tablet application. Which means, there is no way we can know all possible IPs that are to be whitelisted as mobile phones and tablets can so many in number and any device in the city/state/country/globe.
So, It is very LEAST LIKELY to apply IP Whitelisting on such Experience APIs whose consumers are typically Mobile Phones or Tablets.
NEW QUESTION 41
An API implementation is being designed that must invoke an Order API, which is known to repeatedly experience downtime.
For this reason, a fallback API is to be called when the Order API is unavailable.
What approach to designing the invocation of the fallback API provides the best resilience?
- A. Redirect client requests through an HTTP 307 Temporary Redirect status code to the fallback API whenever the Order API is unavailable
- B. Create a separate entry for the Order API in API Manager, and then invoke this API as a fallback API if the primary Order API is unavailable
- C. Search Anypoint Exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the Order API
- D. Set an option in the HTTP Requester component that invokes the Order API to instead invoke a fallback API whenever an HTTP 4xx or 5xx response status code is returned from the Order API
Search Anypoint exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the order API
>> It is not ideal and good approach, until unless there is a pre-approved agreement with the API clients that they will receive a HTTP 3xx temporary redirect status code and they have to implement fallback logic their side to call another API.
>> Creating separate entry of same Order API in API manager would just create an another instance of it on top of same API implementation. So, it does NO GOOD by using clone od same API as a fallback API.
Fallback API should be ideally a different API implementation that is not same as primary one.
>> There is NO option currently provided by Anypoint HTTP Connector that allows us to invoke a fallback API when we receive certain HTTP status codes in response.
The only statement TRUE in the given options is to Search Anypoint exchange for a suitable existing fallback API, and then implement invocations to this fallback API in addition to the order API.
NEW QUESTION 42
An API experiences a high rate of client requests (TPS) vwth small message paytoads. How can usage limits be imposed on the API based on the type of client application?
- A. Use a cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) policy to limit resource sharing between client applications, configured by the client application type
- B. Use an SLA-based rate limiting policy and assign a client application to a matching SLA tier based on its type
- C. Use a rate limiting policy and a client ID enforcement policy, each configured by the client application type
- D. Use a spike control policy that limits the number of requests for each client application type
Use an SLA-based rate limiting policy and assign a client application to a matching SLA tier
based on its type.
>> SLA tiers will come into play whenever any limits to be imposed on APIs based on client type
NEW QUESTION 43